In a recent development, Nigeria's National Assembly has ratified President Bola Tinubu's declaration of a state of emergency in Rivers State, a key oil-producing region in the Niger Delta. This decision, aimed at curbing pipeline vandalism and addressing political unrest within the opposition People's Democratic Party (PDP), has sparked significant debate due to the method of approval—a voice vote—used by the lawmakers.
The emergency measures, which include the suspension of the state's opposition governor, are intended to stabilize the region following an explosion that disrupted the Trans Niger Pipeline, a critical oil transportation route. While the urgency of the situation is acknowledged, the procedural approach taken by the National Assembly has raised constitutional concerns.
Critics argue that such a significant decision requires a two-thirds majority, which cannot be accurately determined through a voice vote. Atedo Peterside, a prominent Nigerian entrepreneur, emphasized this point, stating, "A two-thirds majority cannot be achieved via a voice vote. Members voting for or against the resolution to ratify the President's emergency actions must identify themselves and cast their votes individually.
Echoing this sentiment, Peter Obi, a former Anambra State governor and presidential candidate, expressed concerns over the potential erosion of democratic principles. He remarked, "You cannot determine a two-thirds majority by a voice vote. While a two-thirds majority is crucial, it does not justify bypassing proper procedures or undermining the principles of transparency and accountability.
The reliance on a voice vote for such a pivotal decision has ignited discussions about the integrity of Nigeria's legislative processes. Observers and stakeholders are calling for adherence to constitutional protocols to ensure that democratic principles are upheld, especially when addressing issues of national importance.
As the situation in Rivers State unfolds, the focus remains on both the effectiveness of the emergency measures in restoring stability and the procedural integrity of the legislative process that approved them.